What's next for us?
First, the three themes that have guided us for the past five years --
build the culture of excellence, enhance the educational experience,
build the Maryland family -- remain fundamental, and we will continue to
pursue them vigorously.
At the same time we are taking steps to
adapt to the changing economic and global realities. I have identified
three focuses. The first two relate to financial circumstances - they
are partnerships and innovation. The third relates to our international
priorities.
First our focus on partnerships. We need to
accelerate the building of partnerships that allow us to leverage our
resources and expand our effective assets. This will be a primary
mechanism for us to increase opportunities for students and faculty, and
also to increase our impact as a university. Because of our location
and position, we have exceptional opportunities to build partnerships
with major organizations. The focus should be broad, including
partnerships with federal laboratories like NIH, NOAA, NASA, NIST, to
name a few of more than 100 labs located around the campus; partnerships
with the Smithsonian, the National Archives, and the National Symphony,
as exemplars; partnerships with corporations like biotech companies;
partnerships with state agencies like with the Department of Business
and Economic Development; with schools; partnerships with countries
like China through the Ministry of Science and Technology and Ministry
of Education; partnerships through professional development programs
like those we have in China, Taiwan, Argentina as well as here at home;
and partnerships with universities at home and abroad.
Our
success at turning partnership opportunities into expanded university
contributions will be a primary determinant to the continuing
advancement of the university. We all need to recognize the high value
in securing the right partnerships and then set about to create them and
make them work.
Next, innovation and entrepreneurship will play
increasingly important roles in bringing resources to the campus and
using them well. Last year the Senate and I appointed six task groups
to examine campus operations in academic and administrative affairs,
undergraduate and graduate programs, financial modeling and fund
raising. Each group presented its recommendations on the Senate floor
last Spring. They ranged from accelerating time to degree, to
incentivized budgeting, to combining units. Their reports are
substantial and are now being implemented.
Our research park
M-Square will bring new resources to the campus in due course. We also
need to ratchet up the benefits we receive from our excellent
entrepreneurship programs like our incubator, Maryland Industrial
Partnerships in engineering, the Dingman Center in business, and the
Office of Technology Commercialization.
We also need to expand
instructional programs that bring both resources and opportunities to
the campus. This will happen through the ingenuity of our unit
leadership. For instance the Executive Development Courses given by the
Institute for Global Chinese Affairs have reached over 900 Chinese
executives. There are four groups here at this moment and a total of
thirteen will be here this calendar year. There may be no more
efficient way to acquire enthusiastic, talented and well-placed alumni
than through one of these self-funded programs. The Executive MBA of
the Smith School, given at home and in Beijing; the MA program in
Criminology and Criminal Justice given in Nanjing, and expanding soon to
Beijing and Shanghai; the Professional Writing courses for business and government
given by English are examples of units running with these opportunities. We all need to
consider how we can "do well by doing good." The campus will look
favorably on entrepreneurial ideas for such programs because more should
be created. This is a time to look inward for resource generating
capabilities that support the university's mission. This is not a time
to be passive.
In short we are beginning to grasp the necessity
for innovation and entrepreneurship in our operations and programs; the
need is here to stay and will likely increase in the near term. This is
where the puck is heading.
The third focus going forward is on
international priorities. In this new world our community is a global
one. Our reach, reputation and impact are global. Many of our
entrepreneurial opportunities are global. Our role for the state is
global. We need to think and act globally. The university will give
increased consideration to developing new programs abroad, either alone
or in partnership with others. Programs of high value that can be
self-supporting will add substantially to building the university. We
will also need to examine how we recruit and serve our international
students. I will ask for a review of programs and services for
international students to guide our policies going forward. We don't live in a small town
any more. And we need to see ourselves living in the global community. That's where the puck is going.
|
|
|